From: gaoxiang17 <gaoxian...@xiaomi.com>

Sometimes, when analyzing some real-time process issues, it is necessary to 
know the sched policy.

Show up in the trace as:

         72.267374: sched_switch: prev_comm=grep prev_pid=67 prev_prio=19 
prev_state=S ==> next_comm=cat next_pid=66 next_prio=120 next_policy=normal
         72.267594: sched_switch: prev_comm=cat prev_pid=66 prev_prio=120 
prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=grep next_pid=67 next_prio=19 next_policy=RR
        562.192567: sched_switch: prev_comm=grep prev_pid=85 prev_prio=19 
prev_state=S ==> next_comm=cat next_pid=84 next_prio=120 next_policy=normal
        562.192944: sched_switch: prev_comm=cat prev_pid=84 prev_prio=120 
prev_state=R+ ==> next_comm=grep next_pid=85 next_prio=19 next_policy=FIFO

Signed-off-by: gaoxiang17 <gaoxian...@xiaomi.com>
---
 include/trace/events/sched.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index 7b2645b50e78..00336211aca6 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                __array(        char,   next_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
                __field(        pid_t,  next_pid                        )
                __field(        int,    next_prio                       )
+               __field(        unsigned int,   next_policy     )
        ),
 
        TP_fast_assign(
@@ -244,10 +245,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                memcpy(__entry->next_comm, next->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
                __entry->next_pid       = next->pid;
                __entry->next_prio      = next->prio;
+               __entry->next_policy    = next->policy;
                /* XXX SCHED_DEADLINE */
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> 
next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d",
+       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> 
next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d next_policy=%s",
                __entry->prev_comm, __entry->prev_pid, __entry->prev_prio,
 
                (__entry->prev_state & (TASK_REPORT_MAX - 1)) ?
@@ -263,7 +265,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                  "R",
 
                __entry->prev_state & TASK_REPORT_MAX ? "+" : "",
-               __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio)
+               __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio,
+               __print_symbolic(__entry->next_policy,
+                               { SCHED_NORMAL,         "normal" },
+                               { SCHED_FIFO,           "FIFO" },
+                               { SCHED_RR,             "RR" },
+                               { SCHED_BATCH,          "batch" },
+                               { SCHED_IDLE,           "idle" },
+                               { SCHED_DEADLINE,       "deadline" },
+                               { SCHED_EXT,            "sched_ext"})
+       )
 );
 
 /*
-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to