On 28/08/25 3:16 pm, Baolin Wang wrote:
(Sorry for chiming in late)
On 2025/8/22 22:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Once could also easily support the value 255 (HPAGE_PMD_NR / 2- 1),
but not sure
if we have to add that for now.
Yeah not so sure about this, this is a 'just have to know' too, and
yes you
might add it to the docs, but people are going to be mightily
confused, esp if
it's a calculated value.
I don't see any other way around having a separate tunable if we
don't just have
something VERY simple like on/off.
Yeah, not advocating that we add support for other values than 0/511,
really.
Also the mentioned issue sounds like something that needs to be
fixed elsewhere
honestly in the algorithm used to figure out mTHP ranges (I may be
wrong - and
happy to stand corrected if this is somehow inherent, but reallly
feels that
way).
I think the creep is unavoidable for certain values.
If you have the first two pages of a PMD area populated, and you
allow for at least half of the #PTEs to be non/zero, you'd collapse
first a
order-2 folio, then and order-3 ... until you reached PMD order.
So for now we really should just support 0 / 511 to say "don't
collapse if there are holes" vs. "always collapse if there is at
least one pte used".
If we only allow setting 0 or 511, as Nico mentioned before, "At 511,
no mTHP collapses would ever occur anyway, unless you have 2MB
disabled and other mTHP sizes enabled. Technically, at 511, only the
highest enabled order would ever be collapsed."
I didn't understand this statement. At 511, mTHP collapses will occur if
khugepaged cannot get a PMD folio. Our goal is to collapse to the
highest order folio.
In other words, for the scenario you described, although there are
only 2 PTEs present in a PMD, it would still get collapsed into a
PMD-sized THP. In reality, what we probably need is just an order-2
mTHP collapse.
If 'khugepaged_max_ptes_none' is set to 255, I think this would
achieve the desired result: when there are only 2 PTEs present in a
PMD, an order-2 mTHP collapse would be successed, but it wouldn’t
creep up to an order-3 mTHP collapse. That’s because:
When attempting an order-3 mTHP collapse, 'threshold_bits' = 1, while
'bits_set' = 1 (means only 1 chunk is present), so 'bits_set >
threshold_bits' is false, then an order-3 mTHP collapse wouldn’t be
attempted. No?
So I have some concerns that if we only allow setting 0 or 511, it may
not meet the goal we have for mTHP collapsing.
Because, as raised in the past, I'm afraid nobody on this earth has
a clue how
to set this parameter to values different to 0 (don't waste memory
with khugepaged)
and 511 (page fault behavior).
Yup
If any other value is set, essentially
pr_warn("Unsupported 'max_ptes_none' value for mTHP collapse");
for now and just disable it.
Hmm but under what circumstances? I would just say unsupported value
not mention
mTHP or people who don't use mTHP might find that confusing.
Well, we can check whether any mTHP size is enabled while the value
is set to something unexpected. We can then even print the
problematic sizes if we have to.
We could also just just say that if the value is set to something
else than 511 (which is the default), it will be treated as being "0"
when collapsing mthp, instead of doing any scaling.
