On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 13:27, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > > The path name is a nice to have detail, but a content based hash is what we > want, no?
No.
We want something easy and quick to compute because this is looked up
at stacktrace time. That's the primary issue.
You can do the mapping to some build-id - if it even exists - later.
Linus
