On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 08:45:42PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 02:54:35PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > > In truth though, I hadn't tried p2p metadata before today, and it looks > > like bio_integrity_map_user() is missing the P2P extraction flags to > > make that work. Just added this patch below, now I can set p2p or host > > memory independently for data and integrity payloads: > > I think it is a bit more than that, you have to make sure all the meta > data is the same, either all p2p or all cpu and then record this > somehow so the DMA mapping knows what kind it is.
Sure, I can get all that added in for the real patch. > Once that is all done then the above should still be OK, the dma unmap > of the data can follow Leon's new flag and the dma unmap of the > integrity can follow however integrity kept track (in the > bio_integrity_payload perhaps?) ?? We have available bits in the bio_integrity_payload bip_flags, so that sounds doable. I think we'll need to rearrange some things so we can reuse the important code for data and metadata mapping/unmapping, but doesn't look too bad. I'll get started on that.
