On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:10:55 -0700 Kalesh Singh <kaleshsi...@google.com> wrote:
> > fwiw, there's nothing in the above which is usable in a [0/N] overview. > > > > While useful, the "what changed since the previous version" info isn't > > a suitable thing to carry in the permanent kernel record - it's > > short-term treansient stuff, not helpful to someone who is looking at > > the patchset in 2029. > > > > Similarly, the "how it was tested" material is also useful, but it > > becomes irrelevant as soon as the code hits linux-next and mainline. > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for the feedback. Do you mean the cover letter was not needed > in this case or that it lacked enough context? The latter. As I've split up the series, please put together some words to describe the remaining 6 patches if/when resending. Thanks.
