On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:20:00 +0800
Menglong Dong <menglong8.d...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The fprobe_entry() is used by fgraph_ops, so rename it to
> fprobe_fgraph_entry to be more distinctive.

Sorry, NAK. fprobe is based on fgraph by design.
So "fprobe_fgraph" sounds redundant.

Thanks,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong...@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index 6a205903b1ed..1785fba367c9 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ static inline int __fprobe_kprobe_handler(unsigned long 
> ip, unsigned long parent
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops 
> *gops,
> -                     struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> +static int fprobe_fgraph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct 
> fgraph_ops *gops,
> +                            struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
>  {
>       unsigned long *fgraph_data = NULL;
>       unsigned long func = trace->func;
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, 
> struct fgraph_ops *gops,
>       /* If any exit_handler is set, data must be used. */
>       return used != 0;
>  }
> -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_entry);
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_fgraph_entry);
>  
>  static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
>                         struct fgraph_ops *gops,
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_return);
>  
>  static struct fgraph_ops fprobe_graph_ops = {
> -     .entryfunc      = fprobe_entry,
> +     .entryfunc      = fprobe_fgraph_entry,
>       .retfunc        = fprobe_return,
>  };
>  static int fprobe_graph_active;
> -- 
> 2.51.0
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to