On Mon, 2025-10-06 at 15:20 +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > Nah, you can keep it. I was just confused. Now I looked again, it starts > to make sense. > > Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <[email protected]> >
Alright, thanks! > I am thinking about converting the entire thing to be ply-based (after > we are done with this series). It should make things easier to > follow. Would you object that? I'm on board with that, I left out some other changes to the parser in light of a major refactoring. I'd just need to see how this thing works but it really seems the right thing to do. Gabriele
