On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 02:41:00PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thanks, Lorenzo, for the feedback and support. > > The consensus from the discussion appears to be: > > - Drop this patch keeping the existing check lenient, but make it more > obvious and clear that this is the intended behavior. > - Keep the vma_count_remaining() or another helper and abstracts away > the direct use of the global sysctl_max_map_count. > - Keep the rename of map_count to vma_count > - Keep the selftest and tracepoint patches, which are important for > documenting the behavior and providing observability. > > If there are no objections, I'll plan to send out a new version of the series. > > Thanks, > Kalesh >
Ack, sounds good!
