As the layout of the stack changed for fsession, we'd better test
bpf_get_func_ip() for it.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c    |  2 ++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index c40242dfa8fb..a9078a1dbb07 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static void test_function_entry(void)
        ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
        ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
        ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test8_result, 1, "test8_result");
+       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test9_result1, 1, "test9_result1");
+       ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test9_result2, 1, "test9_result2");
 
 cleanup:
        get_func_ip_test__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index 2011cacdeb18..9acb79fc7537 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -103,3 +103,17 @@ int BPF_URETPROBE(test8, int ret)
        test8_result = (const void *) addr == (const void *) uprobe_trigger;
        return 0;
 }
+
+__u64 test9_result1 = 0;
+__u64 test9_result2 = 0;
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test9, int a)
+{
+       __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+       if (bpf_tracing_is_exit(ctx))
+               test9_result1 = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+       else
+               test9_result2 = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+       return 0;
+}
-- 
2.51.1.dirty


Reply via email to