Hey Lorenzo,
I mean not to beat a dead horse re: v11 commentary, but I thought we were going
to implement David's idea re: the new 'eagerness' tunable, and again we're now
just
implementing the capping at HPAGE_PMD_NR/2 - 1 thing again?
I spoke to David and he said to continue forward with this series; the
"eagerness" tunable will take some time, and may require further
considerations/discussion.
It would be good to communicate this in the patch, I wasn't aware he had said go
ahead with it. Maybe I missed the mail.
Just to clarify: yes, I think we should find a way to move forward with
this series without an eagerness toggle.
That doesn't imply that we'll be using the capping as proposed here (I
hate it, it's just tricky to work around it for now).
And ideally, we can do that without any temporary tunables, because I'm
sure it is a problem we can solve internally long-term.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
