On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC) [email protected] wrote: > The commit message says "we can tell if we should use 'jmp' for the > callback in ftrace_call_replace()", but no architecture code is updated > to check the LSB. Should ftrace_find_rec_direct() and call_direct_funcs() > mask the JMP bit before returning addresses to architecture code?
I guess AI isn't smart enough to know about kernel config options yet. > +config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_JMP > + def_bool y > + depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE > + depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS > + depends on HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_JMP Where this code is only implemented when HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_JMP is set. -- Steve
