On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 9:49 PM Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Dez 19 2025, Menglong Dong wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > index 5f9457e910e8..09b70bf362d3 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct
> > bpf_tramp_image *im,
> > store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
> >
> > /* skip to actual body of traced function */
> > - if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK)
> > + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG)
> > orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4;
>
> There are now three occurrences of that condition, and only the third
> one uses orig_call. How about merging them?
Yeah, I think we can merge it to the third one, like this:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 5f9457e910e8..37888abee70c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -1133,10 +1133,6 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct
bpf_tramp_image *im,
store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx);
- /* skip to actual body of traced function */
- if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK)
- orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4;
-
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
emit_imm(RV_REG_A0, ctx->insns ? (const s64)im :
RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM, ctx);
ret = emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, true, ctx);
@@ -1171,6 +1167,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct
bpf_tramp_image *im,
}
if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
+ /* skip to actual body of traced function */
+ orig_call += RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4;
restore_args(min_t(int, nr_arg_slots,
RV_MAX_REG_ARGS), args_off, ctx);
restore_stack_args(nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS,
args_off, stk_arg_off, ctx);
ret = emit_call((const u64)orig_call, true, ctx);
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, [email protected]
> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
> "And now for something completely different."
