On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:42:26 -0500
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> > 
> > What you wanted to use was perf_event_read_local().  
> 
> Great! I didn't know about that. Which is why I posted this as a
> PROOF-OF-CONCEPT and not even a normal RFC, so that I could learn about the
> proper way of doing this.

I folded in this change:

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
index ff864d300251..34962f80dce1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ u64 do_trace_perf_event(int type)
        struct trace_perf_event __percpu **pevents;
        struct trace_perf_event __percpu *events;
        struct perf_event *e;
+       u64 val;
        int *count;
        int cpu;
 
@@ -499,8 +500,10 @@ u64 do_trace_perf_event(int type)
        if (!e)
                return 0;
 
-       e->pmu->read(e);
-       return local64_read(&e->count);
+       if (perf_event_read_local(e, &val, NULL, NULL) < 0)
+               return 0;
+
+       return val;
 }
 
 static void __free_trace_perf_events(struct trace_perf_event __percpu *events)

Thanks!

-- Steve

Reply via email to