On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:52:18 -0800 SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 17:48:51 -0500 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:01:25 -0800 > > SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > + TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu " > > > + "nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu " > > > + "qt_exceeds=%lu nr_snapshots=%lu", > > > > Nit, but it's been stated that strings should not be broken up because of > > the column limit. screw the rules > --- a/include/trace/events/damon.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/damon.h > @@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(damos_stat_after_apply_interval, > __entry->nr_snapshots = stat->nr_snapshots; > ), > > - TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu " > - "nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu " > - "qt_exceeds=%lu nr_snapshots=%lu", > + TP_printk("ctx_idx=%u scheme_idx=%u nr_tried=%lu sz_tried=%lu > nr_applied=%lu sz_tried=%lu sz_ops_filter_passed=%lu qt_exceeds=%lu > nr_snapshots=%lu", > __entry->context_idx, __entry->scheme_idx, > __entry->nr_tried, __entry->sz_tried, > __entry->nr_applied, __entry->sz_applied, because that's just crazy. Let's use some judgment here!
