On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 12:57 +0700, Nam Cao wrote:
> Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes:
> > +static inline void ha_start_timer_ns(struct ha_monitor *ha_mon, enum envs
> > env,
> > + u64 expire, u64 time_ns)
> > +{
> > + u64 passed = ha_invariant_passed_ns(ha_mon, env, expire, time_ns);
> > +
> > + ha_start_timer_jiffy(ha_mon, ENV_MAX_STORED,
> > + nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed) + 1,
> > time_ns);
>
> What is the +1 for? I guess to prevent it being rounded down to zero? If
> so, maybe we should do
>
> nsecs_to_jiffies(expire - passed + TICK_NSEC - 1)
>
> instead.
Yeah that was the reason and your suggestion is actually cleaner.
Thanks,
Gabriele
>
> Anyway, no big deal:
> Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <[email protected]>
