From: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>

Use SYM_FUNC_{START,END} instead of all the boilerplate.  No functional
change.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <[email protected]>
---

Notes (jremus):
    Changes in v7:
    - Rebase on H. Peter Anvin's vDSO changes on tip:x86/entry.

 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S 
b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
index 9157cf9c5749..a90f4f7de396 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/system_call.S
@@ -9,11 +9,7 @@
 #include <asm/alternative.h>
 
        .text
-       .globl __kernel_vsyscall
-       .type __kernel_vsyscall,@function
-       ALIGN
-__kernel_vsyscall:
-       CFI_STARTPROC
+SYM_FUNC_START(__kernel_vsyscall)
 
        /*
         * If using int $0x80, there is no reason to muck about with the
@@ -85,7 +81,5 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(int80_landing_pad, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
        CFI_RESTORE             ecx
        CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET   -4
        RET
-       CFI_ENDPROC
-
-       .size __kernel_vsyscall,.-__kernel_vsyscall
+SYM_FUNC_END(__kernel_vsyscall)
        .previous
-- 
2.51.0


Reply via email to