On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 18:59:43 +0000 Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > Following the suggestion from SJ and Vlastimil, I prepared fixup to > standardize documentation and comments on the term "zone lock". > > The patch is based on top of the current mm-new. > > Andrew, please let me know if you would prefer a respin of the series > instead. > > From 267cda3e0e160f97b346009bc48819bfeed92e52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:36:17 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] mm: documentation: standardize on "zone lock" terminology > > During review of the zone lock tracing series it was suggested to > standardize documentation and comments on the term "zone lock" > instead of using zone_lock or referring to the internal field > zone->_lock. > > Update references accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]> THanks, SJ [...]
