Prefer using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() over using IS_ERR() and a manual NULL
check.

Change generated with coccinelle.

To: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>
To: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
To: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <[email protected]>
---
 fs/seq_file.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/seq_file.c b/fs/seq_file.c
index 
4745db2a34d12b1084cb059a667c367f4fb56dad..da30cbd6485ca8eff6c2572eab10659c694387d2
 100644
--- a/fs/seq_file.c
+++ b/fs/seq_file.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ ssize_t seq_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter 
*iter)
        p = m->op->start(m, &m->index);
        while (1) {
                err = PTR_ERR(p);
-               if (!p || IS_ERR(p))    // EOF or an error
+               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))  // EOF or an error
                        break;
                err = m->op->show(m, p);
                if (err < 0)            // hard error
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ ssize_t seq_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter 
*iter)
                                            m->op->next);
                        m->index++;
                }
-               if (!p || IS_ERR(p))    // no next record for us
+               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(p))  // no next record for us
                        break;
                if (m->count >= iov_iter_count(iter))
                        break;

-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to