On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 01:00:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Possibly an _unchecked or something? Honestly the suggestion someone > > had for _do seemed OK to me. Part of it is that I wouldn't think of > > tracepoints as being something that I'd call. > The "__do_trace.." is an internal function I don't want to expose. > I'm thinking of: call_trace_foo(), as that should be pretty obvious to what > it is. Yeah, like I day it was the concept of there being a call in a tracepoint that was a bit of a surprise. It was more a grumble than anything else, I did ack the change.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
