On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 12:19:57 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote:

> > 
> >   CPU 0                                                     CPU 1
> >   -----                                                     -----
> >   open(trace_pipe);
> >   read(..);
> >   close(trace_pipe);
> >      kick the work queue to delete it....
> >                                             rmdir();
> >                                                     [instance deleted]  
> 
> I thought this requires trace_types_lock, and after kicked the queue,
> can rmdir() gets the tr? (__trace_array_get() return error if
> tr->free_on_close is set)

rmdir() doesn't use __trace_array_get(), it uses trace_array_find() which
we shouldn't need to modify.

static int instance_rmdir(const char *name)
{
        struct trace_array *tr;

        guard(mutex)(&event_mutex);
        guard(mutex)(&trace_types_lock);

        tr = trace_array_find(name);
        if (!tr)
                return -ENODEV;

        return __remove_instance(tr);
}

> 
> > 
> >   __remove_instance();
> > 
> >    [ now the tr is freed, and the remove will crash!]
> > 
> > 
> > What would prevent this is this is to use trace_array_destroy() that checks
> > this and also adds the proper locking:
> > 
> > static void trace_array_autoremove(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> >     struct trace_array *tr = container_of(work, struct trace_array, 
> > autoremove_work);
> > 
> >     trace_array_destroy(tr);
> > }  
> 
> OK, let's use it.

Yes, by using trace_array_destroy(), it will fix this.

Thanks,

-- Steve

Reply via email to