On 4/27/26 6:17 AM, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> The sched monitor page was linking to Daniel's website which is now
> down. The main purpose of the link was to point to a source for the
> models from the original author and that can be found also in his
> published paper.
>
> Replace the link with a reference to Daniel's "A thread synchronization
> model for the PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel" which can be found online and
> includes the models definitions as well as the work behind them (not the
> original patches but since they're based on a 5.0 kernel and are mostly
> included upstream, there's little value in keeping them in the docs).
>
> Fixes: 03abeaa63c08 ("Documentation/rv: Add docs for the sched monitors")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]>
> ---
> V2: Add link to the PDF and fixed RST references
>
> Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst
> b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst
> index 0b96d6e147c6..d3ba7edc202f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Specifications
> --------------
>
> The specifications included in sched are currently a work in progress,
> adapting the ones
> -defined in by Daniel Bristot in [1].
> +defined by Daniel Bristot in [1]_.
>
> Currently we included the following:
>
> @@ -365,4 +365,7 @@ constraints when processing the events::
> References
> ----------
>
> -[1] - https://bristot.me/linux-task-model
> +.. [1] Daniel Bristot de Oliveira et al.:
> + `A thread synchronization model for the PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel
> +
> <https://www.iris.sssup.it/bitstream/11382/533630/1/Elsevier-JSA-2020.pdf>`_,
> + J. Syst. Archit., 2020.
>
> base-commit: 254f49634ee16a731174d2ae34bc50bd5f45e731
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
although I don't care for the "J. Syst. Archit." abbreviation.
Does JSA use that? Not that I can see.
thanks.
--
~Randy
