On 5/15/26 6:59 AM, Vineeth Pillai (Google) wrote:
  static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
        if (!trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled())
                return;
- trace_ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t, &rq_rsp->header,
-                         &rq_rsp->qr, UFS_TSF_OSF);
+       trace_call__ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t, &rq_rsp->header,
+                              &rq_rsp->qr, UFS_TSF_OSF);
  }

Instead of making this change, please remove the trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled() call because it is redundant.

  static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
@@ -445,15 +445,15 @@ static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, 
unsigned int tag,
                return;
if (str_t == UFS_TM_SEND)
-               trace_ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t,
-                                 &descp->upiu_req.req_header,
-                                 &descp->upiu_req.input_param1,
-                                 UFS_TSF_TM_INPUT);
+               trace_call__ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t,
+                                       &descp->upiu_req.req_header,
+                                       &descp->upiu_req.input_param1,
+                                       UFS_TSF_TM_INPUT);
        else
-               trace_ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t,
-                                 &descp->upiu_rsp.rsp_header,
-                                 &descp->upiu_rsp.output_param1,
-                                 UFS_TSF_TM_OUTPUT);
+               trace_call__ufshcd_upiu(hba, str_t,
+                                       &descp->upiu_rsp.rsp_header,
+                                       &descp->upiu_rsp.output_param1,
+                                       UFS_TSF_TM_OUTPUT);
  }

Same comment here: I think it would be better to remove the trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled() call rather than
changing trace_ufshcd_upiu() into trace_call__ufshcd_upiu().

Thanks,

Bart.

Reply via email to