On Tue, 26 May 2026 14:17:46 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2026 13:08:57 -0400 > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is to make the persistent ring buffer more robust when sub-buffers > > are detected to be corrupted. Instead of invalidating the entire buffer, > > just invalidate the individual sub-buffers. > > > > I started with Masami's patches and modified some from Sashiko reviews. > > I added a few patches to display the dropped events when the persistent > > ring buffers validation checks found sub-buffers were dropped due to being > > corrupted data. > > It seems that Sashiko still marks it "Incompleted". > Maybe we need base-commit: tag in this cover mail? > I also guess that this series does not use "In-Reply-To:" but > only uses "References:" tag in the mail header. I guess > Sashiko's mail header parser missed it. But this applies to mainline. I'm not sure why it's having problems. -- Steve
