On 6/18/26 10:30, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > On 6/18/26 10:21, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: >> On 6/17/26 20:18, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: >>> >>> Yeah and I don't recall ever that a change to a mm tracepoint would ever >>> break someone who'd complain and we'd have to revert it. >> Really? :) >> >> Read the context of the link I posted once more. > > Ah, I see. I've only read the single mail from Steven that referred to the > old powertop breakage and didn't notice the context. > > But I don't think these worries should stop us from adding easily usable > tracepoints.
Steve explained a way how apparently scheduler people are handling it without trace events. You can always remove/modify tracepoints, but not trace events. Anyhow, just wanted to mention it, because so far MM didn't rally know about this implication. -- Cheers, David
