On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:04:08 -0400
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
> 
> When an eventfs inode is freed, it sets ei->is_freed and then uses its
> ei->list to add it to the srcu link list as the list field is a union with
> the rcu list head. As the ei->list is used to iterate over an SRCU
> protected list without taking the eventfs_mutex, there's nothing stopping
> the iteration over that list to see the ei->rcu instead of the ei->list
> and it will read a corrupt target.
> 
> To fix this, change the union of the rcu list head with the children list.
> On freeing the eventfs inode, set the is_free and execute a smp_wmb()
> before adding the eventfs inode to the SRCU list.
> 
> On iteration of the ei->children list, at the start, execute a smp_rmb()
> and then read the is_freed of the ei to see if the children list is still
> valid. If is_freed is set, then the ei_child read is not valid and the
> loop should exit immediately.
> 

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

The critical issues Sashiko mentioned will be fixed by Shuangpeng's patch[1].
[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Thank you,

> Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]>
> Closes: 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806022719.375354-1-shuangpeng.kernel%40gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/tracefs/internal.h    |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> index 39c7a34531e8..677c39b0d62f 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,16 @@ static inline void put_ei(struct eventfs_inode *ei)
>  static inline void free_ei(struct eventfs_inode *ei)
>  {
>       if (ei) {
> +             WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&ei->children));
> +             /*
> +              * The ei should have no children if it is being freed.
> +              * The SRCU iteration has a smp_rmb() to make sure it
> +              * sees a child (that may have already been freed)
> +              * before it reads is_free. If is_free is set, it must
> +              * not use the child it acquired from ei->children, as
> +              * the list may be used for SRCU.
> +              */
> +             smp_wmb();
>               ei->is_freed = 1;
>               put_ei(ei);
>       }
> @@ -627,6 +637,20 @@ static int eventfs_iterate(struct file *file, struct 
> dir_context *ctx)
>       list_for_each_entry_srcu(ei_child, &ei->children, list,
>                                srcu_read_lock_held(&eventfs_srcu)) {
>  
> +             /*
> +              * If the ei is being freed, then the ei->children may be
> +              * being used as the rcu list, which means the next element
> +              * may be garbage. The ei->is_free is set before switching
> +              * the ei->children over to ei->rcu. The read memory barrier
> +              * here makes sure the ei_child is read before is_free is
> +              * updated.
> +              *
> +              * Matches the smp_wmb() in put_ei()
> +              */
> +             smp_rmb();
> +             if (ei->is_freed)
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +
>               if (c > 0) {
>                       c--;
>                       continue;
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/internal.h b/fs/tracefs/internal.h
> index a4a7f8431aff..c61481d04c8e 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/internal.h
> @@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ struct eventfs_attr {
>   * @ino:     The saved inode number
>   */
>  struct eventfs_inode {
> +     struct list_head        list;
>       union {
> -             struct list_head        list;
> +             struct list_head        children;
>               struct rcu_head         rcu;
>       };
> -     struct list_head                children;
>       const struct eventfs_entry      *entries;
>       const char                      *name;
>       struct eventfs_attr             *entry_attrs;
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to