On 8/7/26 23:52, Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>
> 
> Move the folio initialization logic from kvm_gmem_get_pfn() into
> __kvm_gmem_get_pfn() to also zero pages if the page is to be used in
> kvm_gmem_populate().
> 
> With in-place conversion, the existing data in a guest_memfd page can be
> populated into guest memory through platform-specific ioctls.
> 
> Without first zeroing the page obtained using __kvm_gmem_get_pfn(), it
> might contain uninitialized host memory, which would leak to the guest if
> the populate completes.
> 
> guest_memfd pages are zeroed at most once in the page's entire lifetime
> with guest_memfd, and that is tracked using the uptodate flag.
> 
> Zeroing the page in __kvm_gmem_get_pfn() is chosen over zeroing in
> kvm_gmem_get_folio() since other flows, such as a future write() syscall,
> can get a page, write to the page and then set page uptodate without
> zeroing.
> 
> This aligns with the concept of zeroing before first use - the other place
> where zeroing happens is in kvm_gmem_fault_user_mapping().
> 
> Don't mark the page uptodate again after populating, since the page would
> already be marked uptodate before the post_populate() call.

The downside is that __kvm_gmem_populate() will now zero+write. I assume we
don't care about possible performance impacts?

Worth spelling that out.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Shivank Garg <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 12 +++++-------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index 030af0855f8b0..41950c8105b5d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -1079,6 +1079,11 @@ static struct folio *__kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct file 
> *file,
>               return ERR_PTR(-EHWPOISON);
>       }
>  
> +     if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> +             clear_highpage(folio_page(folio, 0));
> +             folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> +     }
> +
>       *pfn = folio_file_pfn(folio, index);
>       if (max_order)
>               *max_order = 0;
> @@ -1108,11 +1113,6 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> -             clear_highpage(folio_page(folio, 0));
> -             folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> -     }
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_CONVERT
>       if (kvm_gmem_is_private_mem(file_inode(file), index))
>               r = kvm_arch_gmem_make_private(kvm, gfn, *pfn,
> @@ -1159,8 +1159,6 @@ static long __kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>       }
>  
>       ret = post_populate(kvm, gfn, pfn, src_page, opaque);
> -     if (!ret)
> -             folio_mark_uptodate(folio);

In case post-populate failed, do we want to re-zero the pages?

-- 
Cheers,

David

Reply via email to