On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:09:27 +0100 Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This is a pre-existing issue, but if an oversized event causes > > > trace_remote_iter_print_event() to return -EOVERFLOW, will this break > > > the loop without calling trace_remote_iter_move()? > > > > > > Since the event is left unconsumed in the buffer, could this lead to an > > > uninterruptible infinite loop (hard lockup) when reading the trace pipe? > > > > I'll let you answer the above. > > > > -- Steve > > I don't believe this can realistically happen, trace_seq buffer is 8K and > remote > events are really small. They are small until they are not ;-) Is there anything that forces their size to be small? -- Steve
