On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:31:23 +0100 > Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looking at the function again, shouldn't we add !rb_is_static(cpu_buffer) as > > well to the full page test? > > Why? > > -- Steve
So that the splice can make progress when the ring-buffer is presistent or user-mapped. Or do we say that's expected behaviour? -- Vincent
