Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) 
to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Reading a per-CPU buffer_meta file for an offline or unallocated CPU 
causes a NULL pointer dereference.
--

commit f8d13605bef286fcf84c808917e1ab8eeeade189
Author: David Carlier <[email protected]>

tracing: Take trace_types_lock when dropping the buffer_meta reference

This commit fixes the error path in tracing_buffer_meta_open() by using
trace_array_put() instead of __trace_array_put(). This ensures the
trace_types_lock is properly held when dropping the trace array reference
if ring_buffer_meta_seq_init() fails.

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -5881,7 +5881,7 @@ static int tracing_buffer_meta_open(struct inode 
> *inode, struct file *filp)
>  
>       ret = ring_buffer_meta_seq_init(filp, tr->array_buffer.buffer, cpu);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but reading a per-CPU buffer_meta file for an
offline or unallocated CPU causes a NULL pointer dereference.

A user with privileges to read tracefs can open and read
/sys/kernel/tracing/per_cpu/cpuX/buffer_meta where cpuX is a CPU that has
never been online. This invokes tracing_buffer_meta_open(), which blindly
initializes the seq_file via ring_buffer_meta_seq_init():

kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:ring_buffer_meta_seq_init() {
        ...
        m = file->private_data;
        m->private = buffer->buffers[cpu];
        ...
}

Because alloc_buffer() only dynamically allocates cpu_buffer structs for
currently online CPUs via CPU hotplug callbacks, this pointer is NULL for
unallocated CPUs. The subsequent read invokes rbm_start(), which immediately
dereferences the NULL pointer:

kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:rbm_start() {
        struct ring_buffer_cpu_meta *meta = cpu_buffer->ring_meta;
        ...
}

Should there be NULL validation for buffer->buffers[cpu] before allowing
the file to be successfully opened, or perhaps a check inside rbm_start()
to handle it gracefully?

>       if (ret < 0)
> -             __trace_array_put(tr);
> +             trace_array_put(tr);
>       return ret;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review ยท 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1

Reply via email to