On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 09:35:59AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
> 
> In fprobe_return(), the shadow-stack iteration and exit_handler
> invocations were protected by preempt_disable_notrace().
> However, unregister_fprobe() and unregister_fprobe_async() (used
> by BPF kprobe-multi) rely on standard RCU grace periods (synchronize_rcu()
> and call_rcu()) to wait until the fprobe is no longer in use before
> freeing it.
> 
> In preemptible kernels (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y), standard RCU grace
> periods do not wait for pure preempt_disable_notrace() critical
> sections. Consequently, an unregistered fprobe may be freed while
> a concurrent CPU executing fprobe_return() is still running
> fp->exit_handler(), causing a use-after-free.

Actually, standard RCU grace periods wait for preemption-disabled regions
of code regardless of kernel configuration.  So if the original code
below was broken, that indicates a bug in RCU.

So do you have a reproducer for this?

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> To resolve this, protect fprobe_return() with guard(rcu)() matching
> fprobe_fgraph_entry(). This ensures both synchronous unregister_fprobe()
> and asynchronous unregister_fprobe_async() safely wait for in-flight
> exit_handlers to complete via standard RCU grace periods.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-e46bcd68-4a56-4f19-a255-e3772980e5e3
> Fixes: 657b594b2084 ("fprobe: Fix unregister_fprobe() to wait for RCU grace 
> period")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c |    3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index 9f2d98181779..c3e1580bc648 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
>       size_words = SIZE_IN_LONG(size);
>       ret_ip = ftrace_regs_get_instruction_pointer(fregs);
>  
> -     preempt_disable_notrace();
> +     guard(rcu)();
>  
>       curr = 0;
>       while (size_words > curr) {
> @@ -687,7 +687,6 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
>               }
>               curr += size;
>       }
> -     preempt_enable_notrace();
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_return);
>  
> 

Reply via email to