On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 09:19:12AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
> 
> unregister_fprobe() and unregister_fprobe_async() (used by BPF
> kprobe-multi) rely on standard RCU grace periods (synchronize_rcu()
> and call_rcu()) to wait until in-flight fprobe handlers complete before
> freeing the fprobe.
> 
> However, if an fprobe handler executes while RCU is not watching (such
> as in the idle loop or nohz_full extended quiescent states), standard
> RCU does not track preemption-disabled sections. Consequently,
> synchronize_rcu() does not wait for those executions, which can lead
> to a use-after-free if the fprobe is freed immediately after
> unregistration. Ensure handlers exit early when !rcu_is_watching().
> 
> Furthermore, fprobe_fgraph_entry() and fprobe_ftrace_entry() previously
> used guard(rcu)() and rcu_read_lock(), which invoke lockdep on every
> hit under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. This adds overhead and can cause lockdep
> recursion if probed functions interact with lockdep.
> 
> Since rhltable_lookup() and rhl_for_each_entry_rcu() use
> rcu_dereference_all_check() (which checks rcu_read_lock_any_held()),
> holding preemption disabled via rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() is fully
> valid and sufficient so long as rcu_is_watching() is true.
> 
> Define and use guard(rcu_sched_notrace)() across fprobe_ftrace_entry(),
> fprobe_fgraph_entry(), and fprobe_return(). This eliminates fast-path
> rcu_read_lock() and lockdep overhead while guaranteeing safe grace
> period synchronization.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-e46bcd68-4a56-4f19-a255-e3772980e5e3
> Fixes: 657b594b2084 ("fprobe: Fix unregister_fprobe() to wait for RCU grace 
> period")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

>From an RCU perspective:

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>

> ---
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index 9f2d98181779..da286619c5d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ static struct rhltable fprobe_ip_table;
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(fprobe_mutex);
>  static struct fgraph_ops fprobe_graph_ops;
>  
> +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(rcu_sched_notrace,
> +                 rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(),
> +                 rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace())
> +
>  static u32 fprobe_node_hashfn(const void *data, u32 len, u32 seed)
>  {
>       return hash_ptr(*(unsigned long **)data, 32);
> @@ -329,16 +333,14 @@ static void fprobe_ftrace_entry(unsigned long ip, 
> unsigned long parent_ip,
>       struct fprobe *fp;
>       int bit;
>  
> +     if (!rcu_is_watching())
> +             return;
> +
>       bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(ip, parent_ip);
>       if (bit < 0)
>               return;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disables preemption, but
> -      * rhltable_lookup() checks whether rcu_read_lcok is held.
> -      * So we take rcu_read_lock() here.
> -      */
> -     rcu_read_lock();
> +     guard(rcu_sched_notrace)();
>       head = rhltable_lookup(&fprobe_ip_table, &ip, fprobe_rht_params);
>  
>       rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
> @@ -353,7 +355,6 @@ static void fprobe_ftrace_entry(unsigned long ip, 
> unsigned long parent_ip,
>               else
>                       __fprobe_handler(ip, parent_ip, fp, fregs, NULL);
>       }
> -     rcu_read_unlock();
>       ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_ftrace_entry);
> @@ -567,10 +568,13 @@ static int fprobe_fgraph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent 
> *trace, struct fgraph_ops
>       struct fprobe *fp;
>       int used, ret;
>  
> +     if (!rcu_is_watching())
> +             return 0;
> +
>       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fregs))
>               return 0;
>  
> -     guard(rcu)();
> +     guard(rcu_sched_notrace)();
>       head = rhltable_lookup(&fprobe_ip_table, &func, fprobe_rht_params);
>       reserved_words = 0;
>       rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(node, pos, head, hlist) {
> @@ -665,13 +669,16 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret 
> *trace,
>       int size, curr;
>       int size_words;
>  
> +     if (!rcu_is_watching())
> +             return;
> +
>       fgraph_data = (unsigned long *)fgraph_retrieve_data(gops->idx, &size);
>       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fgraph_data))
>               return;
>       size_words = SIZE_IN_LONG(size);
>       ret_ip = ftrace_regs_get_instruction_pointer(fregs);
>  
> -     preempt_disable_notrace();
> +     guard(rcu_sched_notrace)();
>  
>       curr = 0;
>       while (size_words > curr) {
> @@ -687,7 +694,6 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
>               }
>               curr += size;
>       }
> -     preempt_enable_notrace();
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_return);
>  
> 

Reply via email to