On 10/9/26 20:04, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> When performing mlock() or munlock() otherwise normal VMAs have VMA_IO_BIT
> solely to fix a race with migration which might otherwise double-count
> mlock VMAs.
> 
> This is unnecessary - at the point of applying folio mlock state, whether
> setting or clearing PG_mlocked, we know whether or not we are locking.
> 
> Solve this in two ways - thread a boolean through the page table walk
> indicating whether a lock or unlock is being performed, and run a locking
> walk with VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT set and VMA_LOCKED_BIT cleared.
> 
> This state never occurs otherwise, as VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT always implies
> VMA_LOCKED_BIT. These are also always cleared together.
> 
> Then, update folio_add_lru_vma() and mlock_folio() to check only for
> VMA_LOCKED_BIT, and update try_to_unmap_one() to check for VMA_LOCKED_MASK
> instead.
> 
> Also remove the useless invocation of allow_mlock_munlock() which simply
> returns true if unlocking and instead rename it to allow_mlock() and only
> call it when locking.
> 
> With the other mlock abuse of VMA_IO_BIT addressed, update
> mlock_vma_folio() and folio_add_lru_vma() to simply test for
> VMA_LOCKED_BIT.
> 
> The munlock_vma_folio() function tests VMA_LOCKED_MASK instead, as an
> unmap racing with the locking walk must still munlock folios the walk has
> already counted.
> 
> Additionally, in order to ensure a racing unmap/migration releases the
> reference munlock_folio() took (whose put was batched), check
> VMA_LOCKED_MASK before calling mlock_drain_local() in try_to_unmap_one()
> and try_to_migrate_one().
> 
> While here, also replace some deprecated VMA flag predicates.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/folio.c    |  2 +-
>  mm/internal.h | 10 +++++++---
>  mm/mlock.c    | 51 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  mm/rmap.c     |  8 +++++---
>  4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/folio.c b/mm/folio.c
> index 47a437e0f7fd..35e242b48870 100644
> --- a/mm/folio.c
> +++ b/mm/folio.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *folio, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
>       VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio);
>  
> -     if (unlikely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) == VM_LOCKED))
> +     if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
>               mlock_new_folio(folio);
>       else
>               folio_add_lru(folio);
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 4ae08fedffff..ea8fa94ebe1b 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -970,8 +970,7 @@ void mlock_folio(struct folio *folio);
>  static inline void mlock_vma_folio(struct folio *folio,
>                               struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
> -     /* The VM_IO check prevents migration from double-counting during 
> mlock. */
> -     if (unlikely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED|VM_SPECIAL)) == VM_LOCKED))
> +     if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
>               mlock_folio(folio);
>  }
>  
> @@ -988,7 +987,12 @@ static inline void munlock_vma_folio(struct folio *folio,
>        * always munlock the folio and page reclaim will correct it
>        * if it's wrong.
>        */
> -     if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> +     /*
> +      * VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT alone marks an mlock walk in progress, see
> +      * mlock_vma_pages_range(). An unmap racing with the walk must still
> +      * munlock folios the walk has already counted.
> +      */
> +     if (unlikely(vma_test_any_mask(vma, VMA_LOCKED_MASK)))
>               munlock_folio(folio);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index 39215a3eab1f..4235a1518fc9 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -316,22 +316,10 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_mlock_step(struct 
> folio *folio,
>       return folio_pte_batch(folio, pte, ptent, count);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool allow_mlock_munlock(struct folio *folio,
> +static inline bool allow_mlock(struct folio *folio,
>               struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>               unsigned long end, unsigned int step)
>  {
> -     /*
> -      * For unlock, allow munlock large folio which is partially
> -      * mapped to VMA. As it's possible that large folio is
> -      * mlocked and VMA is split later.
> -      *
> -      * During memory pressure, such kind of large folio can
> -      * be split. And the pages are not in VM_LOCKed VMA
> -      * can be reclaimed.
> -      */
> -     if (!vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
> -             return true;
> -
>       /* folio_within_range() cannot take KSM, but any small folio is OK */
>       if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>               return true;
> @@ -352,6 +340,7 @@ static int mlock_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  
>  {
>       struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
> +     const bool lock = walk->private;
>       spinlock_t *ptl;
>       pte_t *start_pte, *pte;
>       pte_t ptent;
> @@ -368,7 +357,7 @@ static int mlock_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>               folio = pmd_folio(*pmd);
>               if (folio_is_zone_device(folio))
>                       goto out;
> -             if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
> +             if (lock)
>                       mlock_folio(folio);
>               else
>                       munlock_folio(folio);
> @@ -390,10 +379,10 @@ static int mlock_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long 
> addr,
>                       continue;
>  
>               step = folio_mlock_step(folio, pte, addr, end);
> -             if (!allow_mlock_munlock(folio, vma, start, end, step))
> +             if (lock && !allow_mlock(folio, vma, start, end, step))
>                       goto next_entry;
>  
> -             if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
> +             if (lock)
>                       mlock_folio(folio);
>               else
>                       munlock_folio(folio);
> @@ -428,31 +417,29 @@ static void mlock_vma_pages_range(struct vm_area_struct 
> *vma,
>               .pmd_entry = mlock_pte_range,
>               .walk_lock = PGWALK_WRLOCK_VERIFY,
>       };
> +     const bool lock = vma_flags_test(new_vma_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT);
> +     vma_flags_t walk_flags = *new_vma_flags;
>  
>       /*
> -      * There is a slight chance that concurrent page migration,
> -      * or page reclaim finding a page of this now-VMA_LOCKED_BIT vma,
> -      * will call mlock_vma_folio() and raise page's mlock_count:
> -      * double counting, leaving the page unevictable indefinitely.
> -      * Communicate this danger to mlock_vma_folio() with VMA_IO_BIT,
> -      * which is a VMA_SPECIAL_FLAGS flag not allowed on VMA_LOCKED_BIT vmas.
> -      * mmap_lock is held in write mode here, so this weird
> -      * combination should not be visible to other mmap_lock users;
> -      * but WRITE_ONCE so rmap walkers must see VMA_IO_BIT if VMA_LOCKED_BIT.
> +      * LOCKONFAULT without LOCKED never otherwise occurs: it marks a walk in
> +      * progress so that rmap-side callers, which test VMA_LOCKED_BIT, do not
> +      * count folios, while try_to_unmap_one(), which tests VMA_LOCKED_MASK,
> +      * still refuses to unmap them.
>        */
> -     if (vma_flags_test(new_vma_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT))
> -             vma_flags_set(new_vma_flags, VMA_IO_BIT);
> +     if (lock) {
> +             vma_flags_clear(&walk_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT);
> +             vma_flags_set(&walk_flags, VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT);
> +     }
> +
>       vma_start_write(vma);
> -     vma_flags_reset_once(vma, new_vma_flags);
> +     vma_flags_reset_once(vma, &walk_flags);
>  
>       lru_add_drain();
> -     walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end, &mlock_walk_ops, NULL);
> +     walk_page_range_vma(vma, start, end, &mlock_walk_ops, (void *)lock);
>       lru_add_drain();
>  
> -     if (vma_flags_test(new_vma_flags, VMA_IO_BIT)) {
> -             vma_flags_clear(new_vma_flags, VMA_IO_BIT);
> +     if (lock)
>               vma_flags_reset_once(vma, new_vma_flags);
> -     }
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 5332c52909be..b4a4b3929044 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -2239,9 +2239,11 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, 
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>               /*
>                * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
> +              * VMA_LOCKONFAULT_BIT alone marks an mlock walk in progress, 
> see
> +              * mlock_vma_pages_range().
>                */
>               if (!(flags & TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK) &&
> -                 (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) {
> +                 vma_test_any_mask(vma, VMA_LOCKED_MASK)) {
>                       ptes++;
>  
>                       /*
> @@ -2395,7 +2397,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, 
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>               }
>  finish_unmap:
>               folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr_pages, vma);
> -             if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> +             if (vma_test_any_mask(vma, VMA_LOCKED_MASK))
>                       mlock_drain_local();
>               folio_put_refs(folio, nr_pages);
>  
> @@ -2770,7 +2772,7 @@ static bool try_to_migrate_one(struct folio *folio, 
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                       hugetlb_remove_rmap(folio);
>               else
>                       folio_remove_rmap_pte(folio, subpage, vma);
> -             if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> +             if (vma_test_any_mask(vma, VMA_LOCKED_MASK))
>                       mlock_drain_local();
>               folio_put(folio);
>       }
> 

The mlock.c changes are a bit over my head (mostly the old VM_IO handling ...),
but it looks good from what I can tell (hoping Hugh could review ...)

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]>

-- 
Cheers,

David

Reply via email to