On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 10:14:27AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2026 09:42:39 -0400 > Jeff Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So in this case the state being duplicated during fork() is state that > > the application itself established. That's why I think propagating the > > allocation failure back through fork() is preferable to silently > > allowing the child to lose that state. > > I agree.
Great, with that: Reviewed-by: Beau Belgrave <[email protected]> Thanks, -Beau > > -- Steve
