Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes: > That could work, though we'd lose some ergonomics around filtering events, not > so much in the unified tracepoint thing but in what fields events have. We > would > need to parse a string (so I wonder if globs can express constraints like > matching whole words or we'd need to arrange the format to accommodate glob > limitations).
Yes. But the transition event thingy (not sure what we are naming that) is only for debugging RV, and the error event should not appear often. So I think some parsing overhead is not much of an issue. Nam
