On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:59:33 +0000, [email protected] 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) 
> to consider:
> - [Medium] tracing/filters: redundant check in regex_match_end() makes patch 
> a no-op
> --
> 
> commit 8e400c22f46c7fff9d91b8c8e837ab24dfa0f5cd
> Author: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
> 
> tracing/filters: Fix regex_match_end() for zero-length strings
> 
> This commit adds an early return in regex_match_end() when len <= r->len to
> avoid underflowing len - 1 and accessing the input string when len is 0 or
> smaller than the pattern.

> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c 
> > b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > index 5e74d2dae40a3..59a0d3ba72740 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > @@ -1075,8 +1075,12 @@ static int regex_match_middle(char *str, struct 
> > regex *r, int len)
> >  
> >  static int regex_match_end(char *str, struct regex *r, int len)
> >  {
> > -   int strlen = len - 1;
> > +   int strlen;
> >  
> > +   if (len <= r->len)
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   strlen = len - 1;
> >     if (strlen >= r->len &&
> >         memcmp(str + strlen - r->len, r->pattern, r->len) == 0)
> >             return 1;
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this change have any functional effect in regex_match_end() in
> kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c?

Oops, right. Please drop this patch. This is my fault (I suggested).

> > +   if (len <= r->len)

and

> >     if (strlen >= r->len &&

are the same...

Thanks!

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to