Ken Hahn wrote: > > Cool, I had wondered if that kinda thing could be/was done (makes much more > sense), but there remains one thing to be resolved. The device still isn't > recognized as I described in the last e-mail unless we up the retrys to 3. > Is it possible to get that changed? I just had a look, and the change doesn't look like it would disadvantage people who can respond faster. AFAICT, we accepted a change (for APC UPSes) that increased a similar timeout constant, so I think that there is precedent.
The maintainer for the hub code is Johannes Erdfelt. Johannes - will you accept a patch that does increases HUB_PROBE_TRIES to three or some higher number? Just a thought: the place where HUB_PROBE_TRIES is used is usb_hub_port_connect_change(), which calls usb_hub_port_reset(), which in turn is the source of the "USB device not accepting new address" error. Could we be falling foul of some marginal condition that is masked in Windows? Ken - what error do you see if HUB_PROBE_TRIES is less than three? Brad _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
