Wolfgang M�es wrote: > > On Thursday, 15. November 2001 16:08, Ken Hahn wrote: > > > Brad Hards wrote: > > Yeah, it's about what you are describing. > > > > Something to the effect of: > > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=6 > > usb.c: USB device no accepting new address=7 > > > > You get to see the same thing with the retry's incremented, but then it > > gets the next address. (8 in this case) > > Me too! Err, some detail? What kernel, what architecture, what device, what behaviour with the retries set to 2, what behaviour with the retries set to 3?
Brad _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
