On Wed, Mar 13, 2002, Maksim Krasnyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > USB folks, what is the general rule here ? Can completion handler free urb > > > or not ? > > > If urb is allocated dynamically it makes sense to allow completion handler > > > to free it. > > > >As Oliver stated, this is messy :) > >But the good news is that for 2.5 all of this is fixed, and you can just > >call usb_free_urb() whenever you want and nothing bad will happen if the > >USB host controller driver still needs to use the urb for something. > Heck. I guess I can't just say that BlueZ requires 2.5 kernel :) > > How about ENXIO error in submit_urb ? Should we fix uhci ?
Yes, it needs to be fixed and it's relatively easy. I'll send a patch to Greg when I get a chance to test it. JE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
