> > Is it valid to assume that if disconnect method is running completion > > handler for bulk transfers will be called _only_ as a result of > usb_unlink_urb ? > > assuming that urb doesn't have a timeout of course. > >No, this is not the case. >The only guarantee you have to make. On return from disconnect >all urbs have to be unlinked. >Completion handlers may be running when disconnect is entered. Sure. But _new_ ones will be called only because of the usb_unlink_urb called by disconnect, right ?
Max _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
