On Friday 15 March 2002 23:04, Maksim Krasnyanskiy wrote:
> > > Is it valid to assume that if disconnect method is running completion
> > > handler for bulk transfers will be called _only_ as a result of
> >
> > usb_unlink_urb ?
> >
> > > assuming that urb doesn't have a timeout of course.
> >
> >No, this is not the case.
> >The only guarantee you have to make. On return from disconnect
> >all urbs have to be unlinked.
> >Completion handlers may be running when disconnect is entered.
>
> Sure. But _new_ ones will be called only because of the usb_unlink_urb
> called by disconnect, right ?
You can't count on that. Sorry no.
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
