> Ok, one of my original questions was if any V4L applications used the
> current /proc interface. If they do, as you say, then moving them to
> driverfs would not be a simple thing to do at this time.
The driverfs API is not without problems. In fact, it's close to
opening Pandora's box.
It turns a simple model of open() - IO - close() into something
much more complex. The recent patch to use it shows that the locking
issues connected to using an API that makes implementing open()
optional were not understood at all.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
