On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:04:54PM -0700, John Tyner wrote: > > Please don't remove the proc interface. This is a V4L issue. It's in > > there because this is a V4L driver. > > I saw that you were going to raise the issue on that list. I said the patch > can wait. Regardless, though, I think that the driverfs is where this kind > of thing is supposed to be going.
Yes, that is true. All of /proc/video should be moving there eventually :) > At the very least, each setting should be broken out into its own file in > /proc/video/vicam/<vicam_minor>/<setting> (or some heirarchy like that). At > least that would remove the need for the parsing of input. Perhaps we can > compromise on this. It's still in /proc/video and the parsing goes away. Yes, even if you are going to stay in /proc now, it should be one value per file. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
