On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 09:48 schrieb Greg KH: > > > > No, the last state will happen when the last reference count of the > > device is removed. So as long as someone (driver, core, who ever) has > > called usb_get_dev(), the device will stick around. In short, we can > > control this. > > Control it we can, prevent it we can't. You see a driver will have to call > it at some point, probably in disconnect. If you really want to do this, > the drivers have to switch to usb_get_dev() on open() and usb_put_dev() > on flush(). That actually might be the best solution now that I think of it. > > What do you think?
Yes, I agree this is the best thing to do (but not just yet, wait a week or so...) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0003en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
