They should go on top of what I sent you before. Didn't you get the patch I sent which should make things work for you?
You need (in order): (o) clean 2.5.59 (o) the patches that didn't work for you (o) the patch that fixes that (o) the set of patches we're talking about now Matt On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:31:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 01:09:28PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > This patch does the following: > > (o) Add comments showing what needs to be done to complete the hot-unplug > > system. > > (o) Add a BUG_ON() for (what is now) a critical failure case. > > (o) Make certain that a debug print happens even if a usb_get_intfdata() > > crashes. > > (o) Add an un-necessary up() to balance a down, for the auto-code-checkers. > > > > Greg, please apply. > > Um, should I apply these patches on top of the others you have sent me > (that didn't work for me)? Or on top of a clean 2.5.59? > > Confused, > > greg k-h > _______________________________________________ > usb-storage mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www2.one-eyed-alien.net/mailman/listinfo/usb-storage -- Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver Umm, these aren't the droids you're looking for. -- Bill Gates User Friendly, 11/14/1998
msg11113/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
