> It doesn't matter too much if we support URB timeouts or we don't in 2.4,
> but I don't like the fact that 2 HCDs support it, but 1 doesn't.
>
> We should make a decision to fix the support in OHCI (I've already
> started) or yank it out of the UHCI drivers.
>
> I the only argument either way that I can think of is in regards to the
> API. It's there already in 2.4 and I'd rather not change the API for 2.4
> further, but then again it's a broken feature right now (on OHCI
> atleast) and only one driver in the kernel uses it, so maybe it's
> something no one will miss?
>
> Anyone have an opinion either way?
Centralisation is good. I'd say enable it.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
