On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:42:14PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > Too bad "sysfs" doesn't seem to want to hold general purpose > read/write files, or it'd have a number of the most important > capabilities: exposing device and interface descriptor state, > as well as the logical structure of the USB trees, "live".
That's not what sysfs was made for :) > >And then, it looks like we could drop the struct module * also in the > >usb_driver, as we are protected by the driver core during the other > >calls into the usb driver, right? (Unless I ever prove a need for using > >the module reference count in a urb :) > > > >Anyway, I want to drop that ioctl field, any objections? Anyone > >actually using this code anywhere? > > Yes, see above ... at least two other users. Ok, fine, I didn't realize that it was being used. I wanted to know if it was or not. So nevermind, I can't get rid of it :( thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
