Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi all,

I've managed to get my stuff running on 2.5 (pfew ... :-)

The first experiments show that the camera does *not* die
when doing a "cat /dev/hda > /dev/null" on 2.5.  Interesting !
I tried a couple of hundred MB's and the camera still worked.
(this would kill the webcam immediately on 2.4).

I'll do more testing next week.


It seems that resubmission in the error case is indeed broken on ohci.

I can't exactly buy that diagnosis given those facts. (All it shows is that 2.6-test1 behaves better, so this failure is 2.4-specific.)

Particularly after taking a quick glance at the code
and not seeing anything that much cared about nonzero
fault codes when the urbs are returned.

So I still like the "pwc bug" explanation best, since
it explains all the facts at hand.  It could be a bug
in how it reacts to faults, for example.

- Dave





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to