On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:50:12PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > >All I can suggest is that the USB support in 2.6.0 is much more > > solid than in 2.4.22, so try to work there. > > > > Mayby so, but first you have to get it to build. It has some > Makefiles in it that are IMO, broken, they are using a uname return > to find out what version of the includes to use.
The kernel makefile system is doing that? Huh? Have you reported this to lkml anywhere? > Sucks dead toads thru soda straws to me. Kind of hard to build a 2.6 > kernel when its trying to use the 2.4.22-pre8 includes. > > See message on lkml. Pointers to it? As for using 2.5/2.6 for everyday use, I've used _every_ 2.5 kernel as my main development station, for email and other work related stuff and never had a problem. My machines run much better on 2.6 than on 2.4, and I can switch between them with no problems. We need to get 2.6 stable to get 2.6.0 out. If you have any problems with it, please let us know. bugzilla.kernel.org is also a good place to log bugs for most subsystems (not networking though...) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
