On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > This looks like it's the manufacturer's fault. If they changed the > > product enough so that it has different endpoints, they should have > > changed the serial number as well. > > You mean the revision number, not the serial number.
Actually I mean the field named bcdDevice in the USB 2.0 spec, which is described in Table 9-8 as the Device Release Number. Yes, that's more accurately referred to as a revision number than a serial number. But the matter is moot, since Doug realized that the two devices have the same endpoints. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
