On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:37:28 -0700 Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> usb-storage isn't very picky about the response at all... what exactly was > happening without the patch? > usb-storage: *** thread awakened. usb-storage: Command INQUIRY (6 bytes) usb-storage: 12 00 00 00 24 00 usb-storage: usb_stor_ctrl_transfer: rq=00 rqtype=21 value=0000 index=00 len=12 usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 12/12 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Call to usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() returned 0 usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 36 bytes usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 36/36 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: CBI data stage result is 0x0 usb-storage: usb_stor_intr_transfer: xfer 2 bytes usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 2/2 usb-storage: -- transfer complete usb-storage: Got interrupt data (0x28, 0x0) usb-storage: CBI IRQ data showed reserved bType 40 usb-storage: -- transport indicates error, resetting usb-storage: usb_stor_CB_reset called usb-storage: usb_stor_control_msg: rq=00 rqtype=21 value=0000 index=00 len=12 usb-storage: Soft reset failed: -32 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
